Trump Administration Wants to Let Pork Industry Regulate Itself
The Trump administration is continuing its quest to reduce regulations—even when those regulations are designed to keep the country safe.
Kimberly Kindy, at the Washington Post, has a great, in-depth report on a new proposal from the Trump administration regarding pork inspections. The overall thrust is to put more safety controls in the hands of the plants themselves—whose interest is profit, thus speed and efficiency—rather than regulatory agencies like the USDA.
The proposal would cut the number of federal pork inspectors by a whopping 40 percent, replacing them with plant employees. Those people, Kindy reports, would be trained by the plants themselves. In addition, the proposal would eliminate line speeds—the number of hogs per hour that can be processed—meaning that each hog would, necessarily, be given quite a bit less scrutiny, and also could lead to more workplace injuries in an already dangerous industry.
Foodborne illness is a significant health problem in the United States; the CDC estimates 82 deaths and 500,000 illnesses per year from pork contamination. Under the new system, pork processing plants would not be required to publicly disclose the results of their own testing, and their testing would not even be legally required to include tests for E. coli. The USDA also confirmed that, under the new system, they “have no plans under the new system to test for salmonella,” writes Kindy.
The Trump administration is not necessarily out of line with previous policies; President Obama attempted something similar for the poultry industry, only to withdraw the proposal after fierce opposition.
As Mother Jones notes, there’s already a model for this kind of sped-up, no-holds-barred pork processing: a pilot program with five large hog processing plants. But a 2013 audit from the Office of the Inspector General found that the plants were at a significantly higher risk of contamination, which shouldn’t exactly be a ringing endorsement for less inspection.
Follow us
Republish!
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
-
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
-
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
-
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
-
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
-
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
-
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
-
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
-
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].Trump Administration Wants to Let Pork Industry Regulate Itself
by Dan Nosowitz, Modern Farmer
April 17, 2019
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreExplore other topics
Share With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
Submit
According to the USDA the Washington Post was full of inaccuracies. Please read their rebuttal. The Washington Post’s article about the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) is a solar eclipse, the USDA said in a release Monday. Following a 20-year evaluation in five market hog establishments, FSIS put forth a proposed rule in February 2018 to the American public – beginning a full and transparent notice and comment rule-making process. The proposed rule includes a voluntary, opt-in inspection system, called New Swine Slaughter Inspection System (NSIS), for market hog establishments, and separate mandatory testing… Read more »
I grew up eating incinerated pork chops and dried out ham because of the fear of trichinosis instilled in me by my Irish Norwegian mother. I have since learned that pork does not need to be incinerated–rather, it should be safely cooked to 165˚F. These changes, to me, were the result of additional clarification and inspections by the USDA. Any attempt to weaken inspections should be resisted, and I am unsure of the science behind the changes to the rules proposed by USDA UNDER THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION. Any attempt to shift responsibility to former administrations is disingenuous, and reeks of… Read more »
Why not talk about inspection and all sorts of other regulatory practices managed at the state rather than the federal level? I know there are pros and cons to any system, but I feel like we’d be socially healthier with less focus on Washington and more focus closer to our homes. We can even create regional cooperatives and agreements that simply bring policy-making closer to the people.