Farmers of Color Still Awaiting Promised Debt Relief
After 13 lawsuits, the Emergency Relief for Farmers of Color Act appears to have stalled.
Back in March, as part of a large COVID-19 aid package, Congress approved about $5 billion in debt relief and other services for historically disadvantaged farmers—Black, Native American, Alaskan Native, Asian American, Pacific Islander and Hispanic and Latino farmers that have been long marginalized by the USDA. It was a historic concept. But where is the actual money?
Grist reports that these payments, which were supposed to arrive in June, never came. In large part, that’s due to a series of lawsuits, one of which was filed by a firm led by former Trump adviser Stephen Miller, that have thrown up major roadblocks.
The initial funding mainly consisted of debt relief, and it survived attempts by Republican lawmakers to gut it, eventually passing as part of the American Rescue Plan. As a form of affirmative action, the money was due to make its way to farmers who have been historically disadvantaged by USDA policies and actions, including during the COVID-19 pandemic. Farmers of color received only around three percent of aid money during the pandemic, under President Trump; in 2020, reports Grist, only 37 percent of Black farmers found their loan applications granted by the USDA, compared with 71 percent of white farmers. The history of discrimination by the USDA isn’t some sort of secret; the USDA, by this point, acknowledges it.
This debt relief was intended to, in some small part, make restitution for the generations of farmers of color who have faced obstacles to creating stable farm businesses that white farmers have not. But a series of lawsuits describes the relief as discriminatory, in that white farmers are disallowed from receiving this government aid owing solely to their race. As in the case of the lawsuit filed by Stephen Miller, this is often politically motivated; Miller’s bonafides in using race as a political lever are unquestionable.
The lawsuits have been successful not just from a political standpoint in galvanizing the conservative base but also legally; three injunctions were granted as a result of the lawsuits, meaning that no money would be handed out unless some higher court, such as a federal appeals court or the Supreme Court, ruled as such. And in one disconcerting instance, the Biden administration’s Department of Justice declined to appeal an injunction.
The Biden administration has stated that it plans to continue to fight for this funding in the courts, although it has not said how, when or why it declined to appeal. One theory is that the federal courts, and especially the Supreme Court, are now tilted so firmly to conservatives that an attempt to appeal the injunction could not only fail but endanger many other affirmative action programs.
One possible solution is to change the criteria for application so that race is removed. In this change, those eligible for the debt relief would be farmers who have filed discrimination suits against the USDA or who have been eligible to take part in a class action discrimination lawsuit against the USDA, which would likely cover most farmers of color. The Biden administration has not commented on that possibility.
Follow us
Republish!
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
-
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
-
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
-
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
-
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
-
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
-
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
-
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
-
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].Farmers of Color Still Awaiting Promised Debt Relief
by Dan Nosowitz, Modern Farmer
October 13, 2021
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreShare With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
Submit
Race needs to be removed! All farmers need debt relief, not just farmers of color. Equal rights for everyone.
If you think the USDA is granting these loan base on race, then the USDA should be investigated.. Stop assuming or coming to a conclusion base on little facts. You are granting loan base on race is the definition of racism. Without all the information, data, and facts you are assuming.