Proposed Hemp Bill Would Open Field Up to More Growers
The Hemp Advancement Act would enable people with prior drug convictions to participate in the growing industry, among other changes. But some producers say it would do more harm than good.
The country’s first national hemp survey was released last week, applying data to trends many have already observed. Although hemp was sold to farmers as the next big agricultural advancement, it has largely failed to live up to the hype, with fewer growers in the industry and lower profit margins than predicted.
That’s partly why Maine representative Chellie Pingree, a democrat, has brought forth the Hemp Advancement Act of 2022, which would make several adjustments to hemp production, including raising the THC threshold for plants and allowing previously incarcerated people to grow hemp. Pingree’s goal, she says, is to encourage more people to grow hemp and to encourage the overall industry to flourish.
Current hemp provisions restrict people that have drug convictions in the past 10 years from being involved in any aspect of hemp production, which means that the groups most affected by drug laws aren’t able profit off of the growing industry. Nearly half of all prisoners in the United States are incarcerated for drug-related offenses, with Black men disproportionately represented. Black people are roughly six times as likely as white people to be incarcerated. Those statistics factor into who, exactly, is allowed to grow hemp in America. According to the recent hemp survey, 90 percent of American hemp growers identify as white.
[RELATED: What We Learned From the Nation’s First Hemp Survey]
In a 2018 op-ed, industry group GrowHempColorado denounced the “discrimination in the cannabis (both hemp and marijuana) industries,” noting that other previously incarcerated people, including “rapists, child molesters and murderers will be allowed to work in hemp; however, isolated, single groups of minorities that have been targeted and impacted by the discriminatory War on Drugs will not be allowed.”
“[That’s] an antiquated way of looking at this, and it’s a continuation of coupling hemp and marijuana, and treating hemp like a controlled substance,” says Pingree. She points out that is not how hemp or marijuana are seen in much of the country, and conflating hemp and cannabis is incorrect.
“In many states, marijuana is legal,” Pingree says. So, why would anyone try to grow cannabis and pass it off as hemp when “you could actually grow marijuana, which has significant amounts of THC, and is what the buyers are looking for?”
The proposed act came out of discussions after hemp was legally separated from cannabis in the 2018 Farm Bill. That legislation did provide a clear pathway for legal hemp, but Pingree says it also created several obstacles for farmers, specifically the current THC limit of 0.3 percent for hemp.
THC, or tetrahydrocannabinol, is the main psychoactive compound in cannabis. Dry, cured hemp is tested before producers are able to sell the crop or use it in further products, and hemp growers have to ensure their products stay under that 0.3-percent THC limit. If they don’t, producers have to destroy the crop, often by burning the whole stock. “They weren’t even giving farmers an option, after all of the investment and the time, to maybe turn [the crop] into biochar or something else, so they could recoup some of their income,” Pingree says. “It’s just ridiculous and incredibly restrictive. It places a huge burden of risk on farmers.” In addition, hemp needs to be tested for THC at labs registered with the Drug Enforcement Agency, which Pingree says clogs up the system and delays other more crucial drug testing.
Under Pingree’s bill, THC levels for hemp would be adjusted: Hemp in the field could be up to one percent total THC and hemp in process can exceed one percent as long as it’s in a bonded facility. Any final hemp product being sold to consumers, however, still cannot exceed 0.3 percent THC.
In theory, this would make things easier for growers, who wouldn’t have to worry about destroying entire crops during the growing process. However, not everyone is on board with the changes. While the proposed act would raise the THC limits in hemp, it would also recognize more psychoactive components of the plant. There are several different cannabinoids in hemp, but currently labs only test for delta-9, the dominant THC type.
[RELATED: Will Hempcrete Ever Catch On?]
Under this new proposed act, however, other cannabinoids such as delta-8 (which is half as potent as delta-9) and delta-10 (even less) would be factored into the total THC measurements. While these are minor cannabinoids, they will still add to the total THC present in the plant. So, while the THC limit while growing and processing would be allowed to be higher, producers might reach it faster.
Some growers say the effort to simplify things is actually more impractical in the long run. “The Hemp Advancement Act of 2022 will destroy the hemp market,” wrote Texas Hemp Growers, an industry group, on its Facebook page. The group says the change will “put many hemp farmers out of business.”
While the bill has broad support from many industry associations, a representative from the National Hemp Association told media last month that there is some concern about the impact of the THC limit on smokable hemp flower. Pingree agrees that her bill does not address every issue related to hemp, but she says that she’s bringing it forward for discussion before the 2023 Farm Bill. She doesn’t anticipate much opposition to the act. “I have my fingers crossed that there’s not a lot of controversy here.”
Follow us
Republish!
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
-
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
-
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
-
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
-
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
-
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
-
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
-
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
-
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].Proposed Hemp Bill Would Open Field Up to More Growers
by Emily Baron Cadloff, Modern Farmer
March 4, 2022
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreExplore other topics
Share With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
Submit
The Hemp Advancement Act will destroy the hemp industry! The largest hemp association in Texas has come out opposed. This bill will effectively kill off most finished hemp products by backpedaling the definition of hemp from 0.3% delta-9 THC to 0.3% total THC. All the gains made in the market will be lost. The smokable flower market will be completely destroyed, and most finished products will have to be reformulated for this new definition. I am available to interview to explain why this bill is being opposed by many in the industry. Zachary.maxwell@hemptx.org
Like Zachary said this is bad, very bad. It may look good on the surface but if you read it, its bad.