UPDATE: Bills Aim to Ensure People Have Enough Food During Coronavirus
But it’s being held up by partisan debates.
Updated March 16th, 2020. With COVID-19 (coronavirus) panic sweeping the world, American legislators are trying frantically to get bills passed to address the problems both the virus and precautionary measures will cause.
Among those bills are several, or components thereof, that aim to ensure people will have enough food during the crisis. Many temporary, retail, and hourly employees will lose their jobs; those who were already struggling to make ends meet will only find that things get worse. Civil Eats has a rundown of two of the major bills designed to keep the country fed: one is a major package, and one focuses on childhood nutrition, especially in schools.
The second bill is a little easier to explain, so let’s start there. School meals are vital to American children; roughly 30 million kids receive free or reduced-price school lunch. But with directions to close institutions where people are in close proximity, many schools are closing, with more to come. That leaves kids without a way to eat.
The COVID-19 Child Nutrition Response Act is an attempt to create more flexibility in the school meals programs, allowing schools to distribute those meals in some way despite the schools themselves being closed. That flexibility is already possible, but what isn’t currently possible without this bill is the degree to which it can be used. This bill is mostly about waivers, because of a very weird rule: There is a program that allows free meals to be served in this manner, but it only lets that happen in places where more than 50 percent of the student population is eligible.
That means that needy kids in slightly wealthier areas—we’re not talking Beverly Hills, we’re talking your normal middle-class towns—would be shut out of receiving the free meals they ordinarily would have. This new bill, which has bipartisan support, grants waivers so that any child who qualifies for nutrition assistance can actually get it.
The other bill, sometimes referred to as the Families First bill, is a huge assistance package, aimed at helping Americans deal with the new reality of coronavirus. Written by House Democrats, the bill includes paid sick leave (because many people are going to get sick), increased levels of unemployment insurance, free testing for coronavirus, and two new food provisions. One of those provisions would increase SNAP benefits, which has a few different upsides. For one thing, many people who use SNAP also work the exact kinds of lower-paying jobs that can’t be done from home, and are thus vulnerable to losing them, so it ensures that the neediest people can afford food. For another thing, SNAP is an effective economic engine, tremendously helpful for local economies.
The second food provision would block the Trump administration’s attempts to slash SNAP benefits, which are scheduled to go into effect in April. Those cuts are predicted to kick around 3 million people off the program, and it sure doesn’t seem like the time to kick people off of nutrition assistance.
That bill experienced obstacles. According to the New York Times, the sticking points are on two issues. Paid sick leave is a major part of the Democratic platform, and the Republicans seem to be unwilling to grant what could be seen as a victory, even if paid sick leave would be a vital protection during a pandemic. The other is, unbelievably, abortion. Republicans are trying to insert Hyde Amendment protections into the bill, which would bar the use of any federal funds—and there are a lot of federal funds being issued in this package—for abortions. Roughly a billion dollars within the bill would go towards reimbursements for laboratory bills, which Republicans fear, despite the fact that there is a pandemic going on which requires laboratory visits, would be used for abortions. Right wing commentators have picked this up and phrased it as “a billion dollars for free abortions,” which is not at all accurate according to any reporting on the deliberations.
On Saturday, the House of Representatives passed the bill, with 40 Congresspeople voting against it—all Republicans. But the process of compromise left major holes in the bill. Companies of more than 500 people will not be required to provide paid sick leave at all, while companies of fewer than 50 people will be permitted to apply for waivers to avoid paid sick leave. This leaves only about 20 percent of the working population covered by paid sick leave—hardly the outcome hoped for by those seeking to ensure workers’ financial stability.
The bill is being examined in the Senate on Monday, March 16th, though some Republican Senators have indicated that there will have to be changes to the House-passed bill to win their approval. Other reports indicate that there are various holdups in the Senate, including a totally unrelated foreign intelligence bill, whether businesses can afford to pay these wages, and a further delay that might involve sending the bill back to the House for revision before it can pass the Senate. In short, there is no bill, and the death toll continues to rise.
We will continue to update this post as events warrant.
Follow us
Republish!
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
-
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
-
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
-
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
-
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
-
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
-
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
-
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
-
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].UPDATE: Bills Aim to Ensure People Have Enough Food During Coronavirus
by Dan Nosowitz, Modern Farmer
March 13, 2020
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreExplore other topics
Share With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
Submit
MAGA.