Cover Crops Are Not a Cure-All Solution
They’re heralded for their ability to improve soil, but cover crops won’t save all land from the effects of climate change.
In recent years, we’ve seen a significant increase in the use of—and funding for—cover crops such as winter rye, oats, red clover and cowpeas. Cover cropping has been shown to help protect land from erosion while also improving soil structure, moisture retention and nutrient content. They’re also commonly added into crop rotations to regenerate soil depleted by years of growing the same plant in a field.
But despite being a tool in the fight against climate change, cover crops cannot singlehandedly overcome the damage soil endures from decades of continuous monocropping and fertilizer use.
Two new studies led by Nakian Kim, a doctoral graduate from the Department of Crop Sciences at the University of Illinois, found that using cover crops to improve soil is not a suitable solution for replenishing soil health after decades of mono-corn cropping and heavy use of nitrogen-based fertilizers. Kim says growing reliant on the practice of cover cropping as a cure-all even has the potential to be permanently harmful.
“In the Midwest, our soils are healthy and resilient, but we shouldn’t overestimate them,” Kim says. “A soil under unsustainable practices for too long might reach an irreversible threshold.”
RELATED: Cover Crops Can Triple the Amount of Earthworms in Soil
The researcher dug deep into the microbial responses of soil in a field that hosted continuous corn planting for four decades. Caretakers of the field, which belongs to the University of Illinois, added cover crops to the acreage in 2018. Two years later, Kim took soil samples for his research to take a closer look at what was going on in the dirt.
“Most studies have looked at the microbes very generally, at the phylum level,” Kim says. “Genus-level responses or stasis can tell us how a soil and its microbial community are responding to soil management practices.” His research was able to show the nuances of cover crops, revealing that they have both positive and negative impacts on soil at the microbial level.
For the negatives, Kim found both long-term fertilization and cover crops favored microbes that have the potential to increase the risk of greenhouse gas emissions, like nitrous oxide, further contributing to issues of climate change. On the positive end, the study showed cover crops increased soil biodiversity.
While the results did reveal a few years of cover cropping does not undo the impact of decades long monocropping, that’s not to say cover crops are not an option to increase soil health. Just like diversity is important in the microbial makeup of soil, it’s also integral in practices meant to ensure long-term soil health.
As María Villamil, a professor in the Department of Crop Sciences and co-author of the studies, says: “Cover cropping should be one of many strategies we deploy to increase the spatial and temporal diversity of our agricultural systems to protect our soils and our future on this planet.”
Follow us
Republish!
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Want to republish a Modern Farmer story?
We are happy for Modern Farmer stories to be shared, and encourage you to republish our articles for your audience. When doing so, we ask that you follow these guidelines:
Please credit us and our writers
For the author byline, please use “Author Name, Modern Farmer.” At the top of our stories, if on the web, please include this text and link: “This story was originally published by Modern Farmer.”
Please make sure to include a link back to either our home page or the article URL.
At the bottom of the story, please include the following text:
“Modern Farmer is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to raising awareness and catalyzing action at the intersection of food, agriculture, and society. Read more at <link>Modern Farmer</link>.”
Use our widget
We’d like to be able to track our stories, so we ask that if you republish our content, you do so using our widget (located on the left hand side of the article). The HTML code has a built-in tracker that tells us the data and domain where the story was published, as well as view counts.
Check the image requirements
It’s your responsibility to confirm you're licensed to republish images in our articles. Some images, such as those from commercial providers, don't allow their images to be republished without permission or payment. Copyright terms are generally listed in the image caption and attribution. You are welcome to omit our images or substitute with your own. Charts and interactive graphics follow the same rules.
Don’t change too much. Or, ask us first.
Articles must be republished in their entirety. It’s okay to change references to time (“today” to “yesterday”) or location (“Iowa City, IA” to “here”). But please keep everything else the same.
If you feel strongly that a more material edit needs to be made, get in touch with us at [email protected]. We’re happy to discuss it with the original author, but we must have prior approval for changes before publication.
Special cases
-
Extracts. You may run the first few lines or paragraphs of the article and then say: “Read the full article at Modern Farmer” with a link back to the original article.
-
Quotes. You may quote authors provided you include a link back to the article URL.
-
Translations. These require writer approval. To inquire about translation of a Modern Farmer article, contact us at [email protected]
-
Signed consent / copyright release forms. These are not required, provided you are following these guidelines.
-
Print. Articles can be republished in print under these same rules, with the exception that you do not need to include the links.
Tag us
When sharing the story on social media, please tag us using the following: - Twitter (@ModFarm) - Facebook (@ModernFarmerMedia) - Instagram (@modfarm)
Use our content respectfully
Modern Farmer is a nonprofit and as such we share our content for free and in good faith in order to reach new audiences. Respectfully,
-
No selling ads against our stories. It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads.
-
Don’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
-
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. We understand that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarize or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
Keep in touch
We want to hear from you if you love Modern Farmer content, have a collaboration idea, or anything else to share. As a nonprofit outlet, we work in service of our community and are always open to comments, feedback, and ideas. Contact us at [email protected].Cover Crops Are Not a Cure-All Solution
by Shea Swenson, Modern Farmer
July 10, 2022
Modern Farmer Weekly
Solutions Hub
Innovations, ideas and inspiration. Actionable solutions for a resilient food system.
ExploreExplore other topics
Share With Us
We want to hear from Modern Farmer readers who have thoughtful commentary, actionable solutions, or helpful ideas to share.
Submit
This is the most ridiculous article. What is the objective here. Are cover crops a bad idea? There is no mention of multi species cover crops, correcting the soil pH, reducing the synthetic fertiliser load and eliminating herbicides. This goes hand in hand with regenerative agriculture, cover crops being the main driver. Pls tell the researcher he is a chop. Really poor journalism.
Were studies done showing a combination of cover crops with, or prior to, to see if a more positive increase in crop health could be achieved? TIA.
Cover crop and no till go hand in hand to trap carbon. And carbon is the enemy yes?. Yet plants and trees depend on carbon
This site is dedicated to upholding the shitty, big ag status quo. Pound sand, Shea.
Even a half decent microbial inoculant and multi species cover is exponentially better than say just a field of mustard. Highly recommend checking out Dr.Christine Jones for her work on this.